Browsing by Subject "Maternal Mortality"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item An Analysis of Maternal Health in Burkina Faso(2014-04-11) Merrill, Elisabeth Mercedes; Mihalic, AngelaSince the year 2000, countries around the world have focused on achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, the fifth of which is to “improve maternal health”. Burkina Faso has made good strides towards improving maternal health and has achieved a 57% reduction in the maternal mortality ratio between 1990 and 2010. While the lifetime risk of maternal death remains elevated at 1 in 55, in recent years the government has instituted several programs aimed at improving women’s health with varied results. This paper aims to survey the state of maternal health in Burkina Faso and evaluate the impact that government policies such as subsidies have had on the overall picture of maternal morbidity and mortality.Item Harm Reduction of Unsafe Abortion in Latin America(2015-03-20) Studer, Eva; Mihalic , Angela; Abdelnaby, Abier; Grimes , ClariceUnsafe abortion is one of the major causes of maternal morbidity and mortality in the developing world. Most unsafe abortions occur where abortion is legally restricted. Like many Latin American countries, Argentina prohibits abortion in most circumstances, and maternal mortality from unsafe abortion is high. While spending three months in Buenos Aires, I met an organization called Socorristas en Red (Network of Helpers). This is an organization that provides women seeking illegal abortions with information about safely using misoprostol to induce medical abortions. In my presentation I will discuss how Socorristas en Red has decreased the harm of unsafe abortion in Argentina by providing women seeking illegal abortions with information on misoprostol as a safer alternative.Item Retrospective Review of Postpartum Hemorrhage Incidence, Risk Factors, and Maternal Morbidity(2020-05-01T05:00:00.000Z) Chu, Tina Meikei; Morgan, Jamie; Horsager-Boehrer, Robyn; Reed, W. GaryBACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains one of the most common causes of maternal mortality worldwide. In the US, PPH accounts for 2-3% of yearly maternal deaths and is also associated with serious morbidity including the need for blood transfusion, ICU admission, and hysterectomy. In the recent years, PPH risk assessment tools have been widely implemented in an attempt to identify woman at risk for hemorrhage and preemptively mobilize resources. The most commonly used trinary assessment tool from the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) assigns women to a low, medium or high-risk category; however, its utility has only been validated in relation to need for blood transfusion, which can be subjective. LOCAL PROBLEM: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recently released maternal safety bundles to reduce obstetric complications and rates of maternal morbidity and mortality. At UT Southwestern's Clements University Hospital (CUH), obstetricians and gynecologists recognized that a three-category approach to PPH risk stratification may hinder efficient PPH diagnosis and management. The Maternal-Fetal Medicine team developed a quality improvement project to identify hemorrhage risk factors and implement a PPH risk score in the labor and delivery unit. METHODS: Retrospective cohort review of all deliveries at CUH between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018 was conducted. Data on all antepartum and intrapartum hemorrhage risk factors using the trinary risk score developed by the CMQCC was analyzed and used to assign a risk category low, medium or high. A validated formula, utilizing maternal height, weight, ante- and post-partum hematocrits, was used to calculate each patient's blood loss. Calculated blood loss, need for intervention (uterotonic administration) and maternal morbidities (need for blood transfusion, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and/or hysterectomy) were correlated to PPH risk categorization as well as to a developed numeric risk score. PPH was defined as blood loss exceeding 1,000 mL. Data was analyzed using standard methods of rates and proportions, Chi-square, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with p<0.05 considered significant. Quality improvement tools, including PDSA cycles, process maps, a SIPOC diagram, and FMEA were developed. INTERVENTIONS: A modified PPH risk assessment score that assigned a point value of 1 or 2 to hemorrhage risk factors based on their perceived potential to lead to PPH was developed. RESULTS: Of the 1855 deliveries, the median calculated blood loss was 879 mL. The overall PPH rate was 25.9%. The rates according to PPH risk groups were 19.5%, 36.6%, and 27.9%, respectively. The rate of PPH was significantly lower in the low risk group (p<0.001) but did not differ between the medium and high-risk groups (p= 0.11). The median blood loss was lowest in the low risk group (p<0.001). The transfusion rate correlated with risk stratification, with rates of 0.9%, 2.7% and 7% in the low, medium and high-risk groups, respectively. Overall, 178 women (9.5%) were treated with uterotonics, 38 (2.0%) required transfusion, 7 (0.4%) needed ICU admission and 12 (0.6%) underwent hysterectomy. Relative to low and medium-risk stratifications, women in the high-risk group were 2.3 times more likely to require uterotonic administration. Women in the low-risk group were 83% less likely to experience transfusion, ICU admission or hysterectomy compared to medium and high-risk women. Conversely, women in the high-risk group had a 4.1 fold increase in these same morbidities. CONCLUSION: Relative to the low and medium-risk stratifications, women classified as high risk for hemorrhage are indeed more likely to require uterotonic administration and also suffer disproportionately higher maternal morbidity. The trinary risk stratification tool commonly used to predict PPH distinguishes women at lower risk for hemorrhage compared to the general population. However, determining which women are most likely to hemorrhage at delivery evades prediction using current risk assessment tools. Though hypothesized that a numeric scoring system would better predict PPH and morbidity than the currently used trinary risk assessment, this was not substantiated by our data. More work needs to be conducted to understand which of the identified risk factors is most highly associated with hemorrhage, particularly in the low and medium risk groups, since women in these groups make up the majority of the obstetric population.