Assessment of Dermatology Clinic Resources at Safety-Net Hospitals: Results from a National Survey

dc.contributor.advisorChong, Benjamin F.en
dc.contributor.committeeMemberPandya, Amiten
dc.contributor.committeeMemberJacobe, Heidien
dc.creatorMalviya, Neetaen
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-02T19:23:38Z
dc.date.available2019-08-02T19:23:38Z
dc.date.created2017-06
dc.date.issued2017-03-24
dc.date.submittedJune 2017
dc.date.updated2019-08-02T19:23:38Z
dc.descriptionThe general metadata -- e.g., title, author, abstract, subject headings, etc. -- is publicly available, but access to the submitted files is restricted to UT Southwestern campus access and/or authorized UT Southwestern users.en
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The extent of resources available to outpatient dermatology clinics at safety-net hospitals providing care to the underserved is not well characterized. Identification of resource gaps can direct strategies that improve dermatologic care to this population. OBJECTIVE: To determine the state of resources at safety-net dermatology clinics. We hypothesized that staffing and specialty services at safety-net hospital dermatology clinics were suboptimal, and that these clinics have long patient wait-times and high no-show rates. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted to assess resources at outpatient dermatology clinics in safety-net hospitals affiliated with US dermatology residency programs. Surveys consisting of 42 questions were sent via e-mail to the chiefs of outpatient dermatology clinics at 50 safety-net hospitals. The survey was administered between July and October 2016. RESULTS: 31 (62%) safety-net dermatology clinics participated in the survey. The median wait time for the third next available appointment for a new and follow-up patient was 45 (interquartile range: 30-90) days and 30 (16.5-55) days, respectively. The median no-show rate was 30% (24.5-35). Clinics reported median ratios of 3 providers to 1 nurse (1.75-4), and 2 providers to 1 medical assistant (2-4). 58.1% utilized non-paid dermatology attendings. 93.5% offered dermatopathology and pediatric dermatology services, while 41.9% had on-site Mohs surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients face long wait times and no-show rates are high, with suboptimal provider to support staff ratios. Most clinics had access to dermatology subspecialty care, such as pediatric dermatology, and dermatopathology. Expanding staffing, improving patient no-show rates, and use of teledermatology could improve access to dermatologic care in safety-net hospital systems.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.oclc1111292060
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2152.5/7086
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectAmbulatory Care Facilitiesen
dc.subjectDermatologyen
dc.subjectHealth Services Accessibilityen
dc.subjectSafety-net Providersen
dc.titleAssessment of Dermatology Clinic Resources at Safety-Net Hospitals: Results from a National Surveyen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
thesis.degree.departmentUT Southwestern Medical Schoolen
thesis.degree.disciplineResearchen
thesis.degree.grantorUT Southwestern Medical Centeren
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameM.D. with Distinctionen

Files