Paclitaxel-Eluting Vs. Bare Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions: Very Long-Term Follow-up of the SOS (Stenting of Saphenous Vein Grafts) Trial

dc.contributor.otherChao, Howarden
dc.contributor.otherGuerra, Andresen
dc.contributor.otherHan, Henryen
dc.contributor.otherChristopoulos, Georgeen
dc.contributor.otherde Lemos, James A.en
dc.contributor.otherObel, Owenen
dc.contributor.otherAddo, Tayoen
dc.contributor.otherRoesle, Micheleen
dc.contributor.otherHaagen, Donalden
dc.contributor.otherRangan, Bavana V.en
dc.contributor.otherBanerjee, Subhashen
dc.contributor.otherBrilakis, Emmanouil S.en
dc.creatorSosa, Alanen
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-18T16:17:22Z
dc.date.available2015-02-18T16:17:22Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-26
dc.descriptionThe 53rd Annual Medical Student Research Forum at UT Southwestern Medical Center (Monday, January 26, 2015, 2-5 p.m., D1.602)en
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The very long-term (>3 year) outcomes after implantation of drug-eluting as compared with bare metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) have received limited study. METHODS: In the Stenting Of Saphenous vein grafts (SOS) trial 80 patients were randomized to BMS or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). During a median follow-up of 35 months use of PES was associated with better clinical outcomes. We report very long-term outcomes on 62 patients enrolled at the highest enrolling institution. RESULTS: Of the 62 studied patients 31 received a BMS and 31 a PES. Both study groups had similar baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 6.9 years the study patients experienced 116 major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Compared with patients who received BMS those who received PES had lower incidence of MACE (hazard ratio [HR]=0.56, P=0.04), target lesion revascularization (HR=0.20, P=0.001), target vessel revascularization (HR 0.41, P=0.02), target vessel failure (HR=0.35, P=0.001), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (HR=0.14, P=0.03). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (HR=1.77, P=0.15) and myocardial infarction (HR=0.52, P=0.10) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The early benefit observed with use of PES vs BMS in SVGs persisted during very long-term follow-up.en
dc.description.sponsorshipSouthwestern Medical Foundationen
dc.identifier.citationSosa, A., Chao, H., Guerra, A., Han, H., Christopoulos, G., de Lemos, J. A., . . . Brilakis, E. S. (2015, January 26). Paclitaxel-eluting vs. bare metal stent impantation in saphenous vein graft lesions: very long-term follow-up of the SOS (stenting of saphenous vein grafts) trail. Poster presented at the 53rd Annual Medical Student Research Forum, Dallas, TX. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/2152.5/1544en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2152.5/1544
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseries53rd Annual Medical Student Research Forumen
dc.subjectClinical Research and Case Reportsen
dc.subject.meshAngioplasty, Balloon, Coronaryen
dc.subject.meshCardiovascular Agentsen
dc.subject.meshCoronary Artery Bypassen
dc.subject.meshDrug-Eluting Stentsen
dc.subject.meshGraft Occlusion, Vascularen
dc.subject.meshMetalsen
dc.subject.meshPaclitaxelen
dc.subject.meshSaphenous Veinen
dc.subject.meshStentsen
dc.titlePaclitaxel-Eluting Vs. Bare Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions: Very Long-Term Follow-up of the SOS (Stenting of Saphenous Vein Grafts) Trialen
dc.typePresentationen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sosa Alan Very Long Term SOS FINAL.pdf
Size:
997.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
PDF -- public access

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
297 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: